AI competitor intelligence

    See which competitors AI recommends instead of you.

    Your buyers are asking AI who to choose. Follow the brands in the answer and find the opening for yours.

    Discover your AI competitorsFollow the evidence

    From a competitor’s name to the exact answer behind it.

    Project management18 buyer prompts
    ChatGPT
    AsanaAsana78%
    NotionNotion67%
    LinearLinearYour brand61%

    Asana leads Linear.3 more answers mention Asana.

    Same questions. Different recommendations.

    What is AI competitor intelligence?

    AI competitor intelligence analyzes the brands that appear in monitored AI answers alongside or instead of your brand. Unlike a conventional SEO competitor list, it reveals the recommendation rivals buyers actually encounter for specific prompts, models, and categories.

    01 / See the movement

    Find the shift.
    Then follow it.

    A leaderboard is a moment in time. Track your brand alongside its real rivals to see who is gaining ground and where the distance is closing.

    60%Linear’s visibility17.8 points gained
    5.6ptsNow separating Linear and Asana

    90 completed answers · The same 18 prompts across five engines

    02 / Open the evidence

    Don’t guess why.
    Read what AI said.

    Open the captured answer. See which competitors made the shortlist and the publications, discussions, videos and product pages cited alongside them.

    ChatGPT
    Which project tools belong on your shortlist?

    I’d compare these three platforms, depending on your workflow: Asana. Shared plans, dependencies and clear responsibilities across teams. Notion. Connected documents, knowledge and project work. monday.com. Visual planning, configurable boards and recurring workflow automations. Start with one real project. Compare the workflow, not just the feature list.

    Writing answer

    03 / Change the lens

    Same market.
    Different winners.

    Your strongest rival on ChatGPT may not lead on Gemini. Compare the same buyer questions across engines. Watch the shortlist change.

    #1

    Asana

    Competitor78%14 / 18 answers
    #2

    Notion

    Competitor67%12 / 18 answers
    #3

    Linear

    Your brand61%11 / 18 answers
    #4

    Trello

    Competitor50%9 / 18 answers
    #5

    monday.com

    Competitor44%8 / 18 answers

    Asana leads on ChatGPT. Linear is mentioned in 11 of the same 18 answers.

    04 / Turn evidence into a next move

    They show up.
    You don’t. Why?

    Find the prompts recommending competitors without you. Follow the cited pages, comparisons and conversations to understand their footprint and where yours needs work.

    Prompts missing your brand

    Start with the exact questions where competitors are being recommended without you.

    Follow their source footprint

    Linear is absent from 8 answers that mention Asana.

    Sources cited in those 8 answers

    1. 01
      Third-party comparison pagesReview the comparisons they appear in
      5answers
    2. 02
      Cited Reddit discussionsUnderstand the conversations and recommendations
      3answers
    3. 03
      Asana’s workflow pagesCompare the page AI cites with your own
      4answers
    Your next move

    Compare the cited workflow pages. Strengthen your equivalent page and review the publications and discussions where you could add useful evidence.

    Citations reveal a footprint to investigate, not a guaranteed ranking formula.

    How it works

    From a buyer’s question
    to your next action.

    Track the questions your buyers ask, see who AI recommends, then review the evidence before deciding what to improve.

    1. 01

      Track buyer questions

      Monitor recommendation and comparison prompts across AI engines.

    2. 02

      See who appears

      Find the competitors being recommended alongside or instead of you.

    3. 03

      Compare the results

      See which engines and topics show the biggest differences.

    4. 04

      Read the evidence

      Open the captured answers and the sources cited with them.

    5. 05

      Choose your next action

      Use that evidence to prioritize content, source research or page improvements.

    Make the next move count

    Match the competitor pattern to the right action.

    Competitor appearances are observations. They become useful when paired with a plausible, reviewable next step.

    Review the content gap and decide whether a new or updated page should answer the buyer question.

    Investigate citation and inclusion opportunities before starting outreach.

    Use the readiness audit to identify technical or structural blockers.

    Continue monitoring before committing budget to a one-off observation.

    Competitor correlation is not causation. A competitor appearance or adjacent citation can suggest where to investigate. It does not prove that one page, source, or tactic caused the recommendation.

    Built for the people making the next move

    Clear evidence.
    A stronger brief.

    Show clients the brands taking relevant recommendation opportunities and scope the work needed to respond.

    01Explain the competitive gap02Scope the client’s priorities03Bring the evidence to the review
    Meet the team

    Investigate why the gap exists.

    AI visibility tracking

    Measure the prompts and models behind the competitive view.

    AI citation tracking

    Inspect the sources surfaced with competitor answers.

    Content planning and publishing

    Turn a verified gap into reviewable content work.

    A few useful answers

    AI competitor intelligence FAQ

    AI competitors are brands found in monitored answer results. They may overlap with organic-search competitors, but the set is based on recommendation answers rather than ranking domains.

    It summarizes how often a meaningful brand appears across the selected monitored results. It should be interpreted with the timeframe, prompt set, and model filters used.

    Yes. The workflow connects competitor summaries to prompt and answer evidence so teams can review the underlying observation.

    No. It identifies a pattern worth investigating. Content coverage, cited sources, site accessibility, and other factors may contribute, but the result does not prove causation.
    The next shortlist is already forming

    Make sure
    you’re in it.

    Run a free audit to discover which brands appear for your market prompts and where your competitive gaps begin.

    Discover your AI competitorsExplore the evidence

    We use cookies to enhance your experience, analyse site traffic and measure advertising. Read our Cookie Policy